OxusTech Arbitrage Strategy

Arbitrage built around market structure, not prediction

OxusTech presents an automated arbitrage approach that looks for pricing relationships between corresponding positions in prediction markets. The focus is on how the positions are priced, rather than trying to forecast which event outcome will be correct.

Prediction Markets

Price Relationships

Automated Execution

Market Structure

See How the Logic Works → Explore Technology

Simplified Arbitrage Example

Two corresponding positions, one pricing relationship

Yes Position

$0.56

No Position

$0.42

$0.56 + $0.42 = $0.98

Combined example cost

Example settlement value: $1.00

$0.02

This example reproduces the pricing logic presented in the OxusTech material. It illustrates the strategy concept and does not guarantee that similar pricing gaps or outcomes will always be available.

How the Arbitrage Logic Works

Start with the relationship between the prices

The simplified logic presented by OxusTech begins with two corresponding positions in the same prediction market. The system looks at their combined price and compares it with the market's settlement structure.

Identify the Corresponding Positions

The strategy begins by looking at the related sides of a prediction market, such as YES and NO positions tied to the same event.

Compare Their Prices

The prices are evaluated together rather than as independent directional positions. The relationship between them is the relevant part of the arbitrage logic.

Check the Combined Cost

In the example presented by OxusTech, the two positions cost a combined $0.98. That figure is then compared with the $1.00 settlement structure.

Evaluate the Pricing Difference

When the combined price is below the corresponding settlement value, the difference illustrates the type of pricing gap the strategy is designed to identify.

Presentation Example

A $0.02 difference created by the pricing structure

The example does not depend on choosing YES as the expected winner or NO as the expected winner. It illustrates how the combined price of the corresponding positions can be compared with the way the market settles.

Yes Position

$0.56

No Position

$0.42

$0.56 + $0.42 = $0.98

Compared with the $1.00 settlement value used in the presentation example.

$0.02

This example explains the pricing logic presented by OxusTech. Actual market prices change continuously, and a comparable gap may not remain available long enough to be executed. The example should therefore not be read as a guaranteed or fixed result.

Outcome vs. Price Structure

The core question is not which side will win

In a directional position, the decision is centered on which event outcome is expected to occur. The arbitrage logic presented by OxusTech approaches the same market differently by focusing on the relationship between corresponding prices.

Directional Approach

Choose an expected outcome

A directional position depends on a view about the event itself. The participant chooses one side because they expect that particular outcome to be correct when the market settles.

Core Question

“Which outcome do I expect to happen?”

Arbitrage Approach

Compare the pricing structure

The strategy presented by OxusTech evaluates corresponding positions together. The relevant question becomes whether their combined price creates a usable relationship with the market's settlement structure.

Core Question

“How are the corresponding positions priced together?”

↔

The strategy is presented as price-driven, not prediction-driven

In the simplified example used by OxusTech, the relevant relationship comes from buying corresponding YES and NO positions for a combined $0.98 against a $1.00 settlement structure. The logic therefore centers on the relationship between the prices rather than selecting the eventual winning side.

This distinction explains the strategy concept, but it does not eliminate execution, liquidity, market or platform risk. Pricing relationships can change quickly, and a detected opportunity may no longer be available when an order is processed.

Small Pricing Gaps, Structured Execution

Arbitrage is built around relatively small pricing differences

The OxusTech presentation describes its strategy as identifying pricing gaps that may be relatively small on an individual operation. The model therefore places importance on structured execution and automation rather than on a single large market movement.

Stated Arbitrage Margin per Operation

1.5%–2.5%

A reference range presented for individual arbitrage operations

OxusTech presents 1.5%–2.5% as a reference range for the arbitrage margin associated with an operation. This figure describes the strategy-level pricing opportunity presented in the company material and should not be interpreted as a fixed result for every transaction.

Small gaps can be time-sensitive

A pricing difference does not necessarily remain available. As participants and automated systems interact with the market, prices may adjust and the relationship can disappear.

Execution conditions still matter

Identifying a theoretical gap and completing the required execution are separate stages. The strategy therefore depends on the relevant conditions remaining available when the corresponding positions are processed.

1.5%–2.5%

Stated Margin per Operation

0.3%–1.1%

Separate Daily Target Range Presented

These two ranges describe different figures in the OxusTech presentation. The stated 1.5%–2.5% range refers to the arbitrage margin per operation, while 0.3%–1.1% is presented separately as a daily target range for participants. Neither figure represents a guaranteed or fixed result.

Explore the Platform

See how OxusTech applies automated arbitrage in practice

Create an account to access the OxusTech platform and explore the account environment, available features and current platform conditions.

Create Account →

Coordinated Execution

The pricing relationship matters only while it still exists

Arbitrage is not only about identifying two prices that form a favorable relationship. The corresponding positions also need to remain available under suitable conditions when execution takes place.

Simplified Execution Relationship

Corresponding positions are treated as part of the same strategy

Yes Position

$0.56

↔

No Position

$0.42

Combined relationship: $0.98

Example from the OxusTech presentation

Prices can change between detection and execution

A valid relationship detected at one moment may change as the underlying market updates. The strategy therefore depends on more than identifying the initial pricing difference.

Corresponding orders need coordinated processing

The OxusTech model presents the related positions as parts of one arbitrage process, making execution coordination an important element of the strategy.

Infrastructure connects timing with strategy

Low-latency infrastructure is presented as the layer that helps reduce the time between detecting a pricing relationship and processing the corresponding positions.

10–50 ms

Stated Arbitrage Window

2–5 ms

Stated Execution Speed

The figures above are the ranges stated in the OxusTech presentation. Faster infrastructure can reduce execution delay, but it does not guarantee that a detected pricing relationship will remain available, that both corresponding positions will be executable under the same conditions or that an arbitrage result will be achieved.

From Opportunity to Settlement

A pricing opportunity moves through several stages before settlement

The arbitrage process can be viewed as a sequence rather than a single action. A pricing relationship first needs to be detected and remain usable, the corresponding positions need to be processed and the market then progresses toward settlement.

Pricing Difference

The process begins when the system identifies a relationship between corresponding market prices that may fit the arbitrage logic.

→

Validation

The detected relationship must still satisfy the relevant pricing and execution conditions when it is processed.

→

Corresponding Positions

When suitable conditions remain available, the related positions are presented as being processed through the automated execution infrastructure.

→

Settlement

After execution, the corresponding positions progress according to the settlement rules of the underlying prediction market.

→

Next Opportunity

The automated process returns to market monitoring and continues looking for new pricing relationships that meet the strategy conditions.

↻

The strategy is presented as a repeating process

OxusTech connects opportunity detection, execution and settlement within an automated model. The cycle can continue as new market conditions appear, but each potential opportunity still depends on the required pricing and execution conditions being available at that moment.

This flow is a simplified explanation of the strategy described in the OxusTech material. It does not imply that every market scan produces an opportunity or that every detected pricing relationship can be successfully executed or settled with a positive result.

Continue Exploring OxusTech

See how the strategy connects with the complete platform process

Explore how OxusTech connects account activity, automated arbitrage and platform management, or review the performance ranges presented for different participation levels.

See How It Works → Explore Performance

Price Relationships Automated Execution Market Settlement